The Career Narratives Podcast with Doug Lester
July 19, 2024

17: Get More People to Say "Yes" to Your Networking Requests

Are fewer people saying "yes" to your networking requests than you'd like? You may be unintentionally causing the problem. Doug Lester shares a simple strategy he learned as an executive recruiter to get the people in his network to pick up the phone and talk. And the best part is, it's simple, it probably requires a lot less effort than you're putting in now, and everyone will feel better about it in the end.

šŸŽ§ Take control of your narrative and advance your career ā€” subscribe to the podcast!

šŸ¤” Need a thought partner with experience as a Fortune 100 hiring manager, an executive recruiter at a top firm, and a coach at Harvard Business School? Schedule a Career Strategy Session with Doug

āŽ Avoid making 3 common mistakes with executive recruiters

šŸ“ø Improve your executive presence on Zoom

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:00.050 --> 00:00:05.469
So you're networking for a job and you're reaching out to people to get a little time on their calendars.

00:00:05.969 --> 00:00:13.195
And you're finding that the number of people who respond and are willing to set aside that time for you is lower than you'd like.

00:00:13.746 --> 00:00:19.390
It can be discouraging, and networking can feel like a lot of effort for not much result.

00:00:19.940 --> 00:00:20.899
You're not alone.

00:00:21.359 --> 00:00:32.270
Even when I was a recruiter at a well known and respected executive search firm, I found that my yield for outgoing messages and calls was sometimes lower than I would have liked.

00:00:32.820 --> 00:00:38.350
But there's a pretty simple way to improve your yield, and it's all in the setup.

00:00:38.899 --> 00:00:47.000
Stay tuned, and I'll share a two-point strategy I picked up as an executive recruiter that you can apply to your own networking.

00:01:25.817 --> 00:01:32.117
I'm recording this episode in the summer, which is a great time to do some low pressure networking for your career.

00:01:32.668 --> 00:01:42.078
So I'm doing a mini-series on networking strategy, and as I pointed out in episode 15, the summer can be a good time to get on people's calendars.

00:01:42.548 --> 00:01:44.668
They typically have fewer meetings.

00:01:44.843 --> 00:01:53.632
There are fewer deadlines looming, and they're generally a little more relaxed and willing to talk about something other than their most pressing project.

00:01:54.183 --> 00:02:13.062
When I was working as a recruiter in a top executive search firm, my colleagues and I would look forward to the summer, when the client service demands of our searches were lower, and we could catch up on, or even get ahead of the game, on the networking involved in assembling solid candidate pools for our clients.

00:02:13.612 --> 00:02:33.282
But even when the people we might be reaching out to in our existing network and beyond might have had lighter schedules and presumably more time to speak with us, they still could be reluctant to set that time aside if we didn't make it easy for them to say"yes." Making it easy for them to say yes?

00:02:33.682 --> 00:02:34.742
What does that mean?

00:02:35.453 --> 00:02:45.402
I learned that it was important not to make the people I was reaching out to for help with my searches feel like I was dumping the full weight of my search in their laps.

00:02:45.772 --> 00:02:56.862
Meaning they needed to understand before we even got on a call that I wasn't counting on them to have a list of a few potential candidates for my search, or even one.

00:02:57.362 --> 00:03:15.242
When I pinged them, I didn't say, write, or imply in any way,"Hey, I'm working on this great search for my client, and I was hoping you might be able to give me a list of potential star-quality candidates." That would be dumping the full weight of my search in their laps.

00:03:15.573 --> 00:03:18.638
And frankly, expecting way too much.

00:03:19.138 --> 00:03:28.557
And to borrow from a completely different setting, that is training classes for my dog, I learned that I should avoid setting my dog up for failure.

00:03:28.837 --> 00:03:41.633
If I did, like putting her in the situation she wasn't properly prepared or trained for, it was my fault, not hers, when she didn't act or behave in a way I would have wanted her to.

00:03:42.182 --> 00:03:48.103
The same thing applies to networking strategy in executive search and when you're networking for a job.

00:03:48.582 --> 00:03:51.902
Don't set your networking contacts up for failure.

00:03:52.453 --> 00:04:04.393
When I was reaching out to people as a recruiter, I would often write or say,"I'm working on this great search for my client and I was hoping to get your perspective on it." That's it.

00:04:04.943 --> 00:04:06.362
Just get their thoughts.

00:04:06.763 --> 00:04:09.139
Very general and low pressure.

00:04:09.588 --> 00:04:13.359
I talk, they listen, they offer an opinion.

00:04:13.908 --> 00:04:15.218
What could be easier?

00:04:15.729 --> 00:04:17.348
Anyone can have an opinion.

00:04:17.559 --> 00:04:19.528
Anyone can be a success at that.

00:04:19.889 --> 00:04:24.379
They don't need to prepare or have any specific knowledge or training.

00:04:24.759 --> 00:04:28.608
They just need to be open to listening and reacting in the moment.

00:04:29.158 --> 00:04:32.449
The same thing applies to you when you're networking for a job.

00:04:32.879 --> 00:04:39.259
You need to make it easy for your networking contacts to say"yes" to your request for a call or a meeting.

00:04:39.749 --> 00:04:47.314
But instead, I've seen a lot of instances where my clients are reaching out to their networks with highly-specific requests.

00:04:47.704 --> 00:05:07.444
Requests that include far too much personal background, followed by an ask that could be something like, I'm targeting two companies in a specific city, and I was wondering if you might know anyone in those two companies in that city and be able to introduce me to them." There are a couple of things wrong in this scenario.

00:05:07.869 --> 00:05:10.928
First, networking outreach needs to be brief.

00:05:11.273 --> 00:05:11.963
Think about it.

00:05:12.343 --> 00:05:27.423
When you receive a really long email from someone you don't know well, or at all, and they're requesting time on your calendar, doesn't the length of the message give you a sense of how much time the person writing it is going to expect from you in the end?

00:05:27.973 --> 00:05:42.442
After all, they expect you to make it through their novel length email, so they probably will also expect you to set aside a half hour, or even an hour or more, to hear them out and then share everything you know about everything.

00:05:42.992 --> 00:05:44.252
So keep it brief.

00:05:44.543 --> 00:05:45.892
That's a basic courtesy.

00:05:46.233 --> 00:06:02.072
And by subtly indicating that you won't expect too much time from them by keeping your email or DM brief and to the point, you lower the risk of them saying"no" to your request because they're afraid you might expect too much of a time investment from them.

00:06:02.622 --> 00:06:18.213
Second, it's too easy for the person on the other side of your highly-specific request to honestly answer"no." Chances are, they don't know someone well enough at one of those two companies to provide a referral, or they might not know anyone at all.

00:06:18.733 --> 00:06:24.543
If that's the case, then you've made the mistake of setting your networking contacts up for failure.

00:06:24.892 --> 00:06:32.612
Before they even get to the final sentence of your, hopefully, brief message, they already are feeling like they failed you.

00:06:32.983 --> 00:06:41.833
They won't be able to meet your expectations of them, and they're going to have to tell you that to your face, whether that ends up being real or virtual.

00:06:42.548 --> 00:06:47.329
People don't like to feel like failures or like they're not being helpful.

00:06:47.759 --> 00:06:48.879
So what do they do?

00:06:49.288 --> 00:06:56.543
Rather than saying"no" outright to your networking request, they procrastinate and avoid responding to it.

00:06:57.004 --> 00:07:03.343
So they flag your message to think about it, or they just archive it, or maybe even delete it.

00:07:03.774 --> 00:07:13.504
And if they do happen to flag it for further consideration, they're unlikely to think of someone new to introduce you to that didn't already come to mind.

00:07:14.024 --> 00:07:19.853
And they're probably not inclined to do research on your behalf, especially if they don't already know you.

00:07:20.374 --> 00:07:26.559
So every time they see your flagged message, they feel like a failure all over again.

00:07:27.028 --> 00:07:28.639
Not a great association.

00:07:29.158 --> 00:07:37.678
And ultimately, they probably just delete your message or allow it to move so far down in their inbox that they might as well have deleted it.

00:07:38.228 --> 00:07:41.449
So for all your effort, you get radio silence.

00:07:41.918 --> 00:07:44.249
And it makes you feel like a failure too.

00:07:44.699 --> 00:07:45.629
Don't do that.

00:07:45.999 --> 00:07:48.829
Don't set your networking contacts up for failure.

00:07:49.033 --> 00:07:51.033
Don't set yourself up for failure.

00:07:51.584 --> 00:08:00.973
Make it easy for the people you reach out to for networking to say"yes." If you haven't already figured it out, here's how.

00:08:01.524 --> 00:08:04.963
First, keep your outgoing networking messages brief.

00:08:05.394 --> 00:08:08.723
Three to five sentences should do the trick in most situations.

00:08:09.093 --> 00:08:12.144
Introduce yourself if the person doesn't already know you.

00:08:12.653 --> 00:08:16.553
If you were referred to your contact, let them know who provided the referral.

00:08:17.103 --> 00:08:20.524
And then tell them, in very general terms, why you're reaching out.

00:08:20.934 --> 00:08:24.973
Maybe you're thinking about your next role, or your career strategy.

00:08:25.324 --> 00:08:31.244
Maybe you're trying to get to know an industry, or you're trying to establish yourself in a new geography.

00:08:31.723 --> 00:08:37.553
This will, obviously, very much be based on the specifics of your own particular situation.

00:08:38.104 --> 00:08:39.614
And here comes the second part.

00:08:40.163 --> 00:08:44.703
Make sure you set them up for success and not for failure.

00:08:45.254 --> 00:08:50.833
Ask for something they'll be 100 percent confident they can do, without much heavy lifting.

00:08:51.274 --> 00:09:00.293
Typically, that might be something like,"I've been thinking about my career strategy, and I'd like to run some ideas by you to get your perspective.

00:09:00.844 --> 00:09:01.703
Pretty simple.

00:09:02.144 --> 00:09:10.474
Again, the specifics of the request may vary according to your personal situation, but there are two components of this ask that are critical.

00:09:10.803 --> 00:09:15.244
The first is an indication that you're the one doing the heavy lifting.

00:09:15.614 --> 00:09:18.144
You're the one coming with the ideas.

00:09:18.533 --> 00:09:24.714
You don't expect them to do any research, work, or even thought in advance.

00:09:25.193 --> 00:09:34.714
The second is that you only expect the bare minimum from them, an attentive audience for your ideas and their reaction to those ideas.

00:09:35.208 --> 00:09:35.918
That's it.

00:09:36.469 --> 00:09:44.943
By doing these two things you're ensuring that your networking contact can be a success and that the person you reach out to can feel like they're helping you.

00:09:45.364 --> 00:09:54.214
You're not asking them for networking contacts they might not have, or a carefully thought through career strategy that's going to solve all of your problems.

00:09:54.764 --> 00:10:05.994
And when you follow this approach, it will be much easier for them to say"yes" to your meeting request without the potential for them to feel like they're failing you before you even talk to them.

00:10:06.543 --> 00:10:08.033
What's your experience been?

00:10:08.524 --> 00:10:14.413
Have you ever intentionally or unintentionally put too much pressure on a networking contact?

00:10:14.844 --> 00:10:19.073
Have they responded slowly or not at all as a result?

00:10:19.472 --> 00:10:28.153
If so, then try this two step approach and see if you're more successful at increasing your yield when it comes to networking contacts.

00:10:28.643 --> 00:10:39.557
Keep your initial outreach to a networking contact brief and set them up for success by lowering your implied or your explicit expectations of them.

00:10:40.302 --> 00:11:01.361
And if you still find that your networking strategy or your larger career strategy isn't quite working for you, sign up for a Career Strategy Session with me at www.careernarratives.com/strategy and we'll get you on the path to networking success and career advancement.